From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26228 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 19:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26195 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 19:01:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2002 19:01:24 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id gBSJ0wY20589; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:00:58 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id gBSJ0wG07639; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:00:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200212281900.gBSJ0wG07639@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj@delorie.com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: dank@kegel.com CC: aoliva@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E0DF317.7080206@kegel.com> (message from Dan Kegel on Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:53:11 -0800) Subject: Re: (toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name) References: <20021228093127.GA455@doctormoo> <20021228163419.GA10686@nevyn.them.org> <20021228175919.GA17177@nevyn.them.org> <3E0DF317.7080206@kegel.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 > I dunno, sounds fine to me if it lets the subsequent real build > go in parallel. If you fill the job slots with busy-wait configures, there aren't any slots left to put real builds in. Of course, this is the point where we could conditionally take advantage of gmake's "don't run these in parallel" syntax.