From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23181 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 16:33:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23169 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 16:33:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2002 16:33:12 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18SLlw-0004D8-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:33:20 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SJul-0002mu-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:34:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name) Message-ID: <20021228163419.GA10686@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <20021228093127.GA455@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00718.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:24:00PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Dec 28, 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I really have to go to sleep now. :-( > > Fair enough. Hope you had a good night :-) > > > Please feel free to make this change on your own; it's obviously > > correct as far as I'm concerned. > > Done. While at that, I fixed a few other fallouts. I'm checking in > the patch below. I notice that you moved the .NOTPARALLEL down to the configure section. While it is there what do you think of removing the serialization dependencies? Also, top level configure no longer accepts --norecursion. This means that one has to configure from scratch in any existing working directory. Is it as simple as allowing --norecursion, or is everything expected to break anyway? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer