From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21200-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30121 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30108 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18S2RA-0002lv-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:54:36 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18S0Zy-0002Bd-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 14:55:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:02:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Richard Dawe <rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb-5.3: dependency on bfd/bfd.h in gdb/Makefile [PATCH]
Message-ID: <20021227195533.GA8255@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Dawe <rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <E18S0BP-00010Q-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E18S0BP-00010Q-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00688.txt.bz2

On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 07:30:54PM +0000, Richard Dawe wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> There's a dependency in gdb/Makefile (generated by configure'ing
> the gdb-5.3 sources) on bfd/bfd.h. But bfd/bfd.h does not exist.
> It seems to be called bfd/libbfd.h now. ChangeLog entry and patch below.
> 
> 2002-12-27  Richard Dawe  <rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
> 
> 	* gdb/Makefile.in: BFD header file is bfd/libbfd.h now,
> 	not bfd/bfd.h.
> 
> Please CC me on replies, since I'm not subscribed to gdb-patches.

That's not correct.  libbfd.h is a different header.  See the comment?

>  # Header files that already have srcdir in them, or which are in objdir.

It gets generated.  What are you trying to do?  Did you run configure
or make in the GDB directory instead of in the top level?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer