From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7177 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2002 02:50:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7165 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2002 02:50:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2002 02:50:22 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBN2o8530268; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:50:08 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:46:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200212230250.gBN2o8530268@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] delete 'force_return' from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00627.txt.bz2 More news ... > I am not sure if David committed it yet, but the patch it at the > bottom of: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-12/msg00560.html > Maybe you already tested it! After grubbing around in three unrelated regressions, I can say that this patch is cool and not causing any visible regressions. There are no problems in gdb from 2002-12-18 to 2002-12-21. gcc broke anonymous unions though. Next up is JimB's patch submission for gdb.c++/local.exp. Michael C