From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17897 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2002 05:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17890 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 05:27:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 05:27:30 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBM5RGb13719; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:27:16 -0600 Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200212220527.gBM5RGb13719@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] delete 'force_return' from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2 David Carlton writes: > I committed it yesterday. Cool, I started another spin for my own purposes this morning. If the Perl gods smile on me it will finish tommorow. I might as well go all the way and write an analysis report for it. In my dream world, developers add some " ... " XML mumbo-jumbo to their gdb-patches mail, and 1000 gnutest@home clients rip through the regression tests. Michael C