From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] kfail gdb.c++/annota2.exp annotate-quit
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212190547.gBJ5lnN24237@duracef.shout.net> (raw)
My testbed gives me 34 KFAIL's on 34 configurations, just fine.
This is native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc v2 and v3, dwarf-2 and stabs+.
I use stock FSF dejagnu 1.4.3. I also built dejagnu from the
sourcware cvs "dejagnu" module and did a test run with that.
That works fine too.
I have appended a gdb.sum file for anyone who is curious.
The KFAIL line looks like this:
KFAIL: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit (PRMS: c++/544)
We can't do anything about the "PRMS:" part, that comes from dejagnu.
I have an objection to the name "c++/544". It is way too easy for
this name to get quoted out of context (the context being that it is
a gdb bug in the gdb database). I think this will cause confusion.
I would like to see "gdb/544" here.
Sure, right *now* while we are discussing the issue, everyone knows
that "c++/544" means a gdb bug in the gdb PR database. Wait six weeks
and then quote some people a gdb.sum report that says "c++/482" in it
and see if anyone jumps to the incorrect conclusion that c++/482 means
a bug in the C++ compiler.
Michael C
===
Test Run By mec on Thu Dec 19 00:20:19 2002
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gdb tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-2
Running target unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-2
Running /berman/fsf/_today_/source/gdb/HEAD/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/annota2.exp ...
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: breakpoint main
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotation set at level 2
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: run until main breakpoint
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: print class
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: continue until exit
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: delete bps
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: breakpoint at main
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: run until main breakpoint
PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: set watch on a.x
FAIL: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: watch triggered on a.x
KFAIL: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit (PRMS: c++/544)
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 9
# of unexpected failures 1
# of known failures 1
/berman/fsf/_today_/berman/native/install/gdb/HEAD/bin/gdb version 2002-12-12-cvs -nx
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 7:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2002-12-19 11:01 ` David Carlton
2002-12-19 13:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-20 9:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-20 10:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-20 10:50 ` David Carlton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-18 20:57 David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212190547.gBJ5lnN24237@duracef.shout.net \
--to=mec@shout.net \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox