From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16746 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 20:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16736 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 20:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 20:53:43 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18Myg5-0003YQ-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:53:06 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18MwoS-0002sb-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:53:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb patch to suppress empty lines, re-visited Message-ID: <20021213205335.GA11050@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3DF6CDC2.5050105@bothner.com> <3DF7C9FF.63429C4D@redhat.com> <3DFA356F.6000405@bothner.com> <3DFA4468.8070205@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DFA4468.8070205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:34:48PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >A few people have expresses themselves in favor, and none > >have been opposed. I don't know if that counts as a consensus ... > > Personally, I don't like it :-) At least not as a default. That's fine by me :) I'll turn it on in gdbinit. Per, could I talk you into a patch with a 'set' option? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer