From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11423 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 16:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11416 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 16:57:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.202) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 16:57:50 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D31A0D2D29; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:57:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] fix compilation error in hppa-tdep.c (hppa_pop_frame) Message-ID: <20021213165749.GA25575@gnat.com> References: <20021213144023.GZ25575@gnat.com> <3DFA0FD5.6010209@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DFA0FD5.6010209@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 > Oops, thanks! What are the odds of getting --target=hppa-elf (a minimal > hppa target) building? That should stop me breaking the HPPA in this way. The odds at the moment are very small, at least because of the following includes in hppa-tdep.c (I think): #ifdef USG #include #endif #include #include #include #include #include (etc) I plan on working on these after having done the minimal work to be done with the conversion. In the meantime, I won't complain about anybody breaking hppa by mistake (I would not complain anyway, actually). -- Joel