Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb.base/selftest.exp: work with optimization

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>]

David Carlton wrote:
> Obviously it's not the most important version of GCC to test with, but
> I haven't yet run into a compelling reason to upgrade to a more recent
> version; and it probably doesn't hurt to have somebody testing GDB
> with compilers other than 2.95-variants and 3.2.1.  (Though your test
> matrix now handles that issue quite nicely.)

Diversity is good.  I was just kinda surprised.

I'm planning to prune my own test bed in the next few days by
dropping gcc 3.0.4, gcc 3.1, gcc 3.1.1, and gcc 3.2.  I just need
one clean monster run and then an hour or two of table-spelunking.

There are result changes from 3.0.4 to 3.1 (mostly good, some bad),
but I haven't seen any substantive changes from 3.1 to 3.2.1.

Michael C