From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12388 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 07:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12364 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 07:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.lampret.com) (193.189.173.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 07:00:58 -0000 Received: from vili ([212.118.94.130]) by www.lampret.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBB9wo229846; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:58:52 -0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Marko Mlinar To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: OC? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 06:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200212110807.45649.markom@opencores.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 10 December 2002 23:01, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Marko, > > What changes to the core of gdb are still needed for your target? > > Andrew Hi Andrew! thanks for coming back to me. As far as I can recall: #define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT Needs to be discussed whether to add it to architecture or target vector? We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we sho= uld=20 move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated names) into th= e=20 temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in the host...). I hope I have not missed anything; we will see what is comming anyway after= we=20 try to build the files. best regards, Marko