From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32235 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 03:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32215 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 03:30:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 03:30:50 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB935PP20682; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:05:25 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB93UnD13245; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:30:49 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB93Uml12905; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:30:48 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB93Um631814; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:30:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200212090330.gB93Um631814@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: drow@mvista.com CC: neroden@twcny.rr.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20021209032404.GA31552@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:24:04 -0500) Subject: Re: re-re-re-re-configuring References: <20021206102555.GA15028@redhat.com> <200212061850.gB6Io3m26371@greed.delorie.com> <3DF3C9D7.90204@twcny.rr.com> <20021209032404.GA31552@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 > So, um, silly question. Why does changing libiberty require that > bfd/Makefile be regenerated? Because bfd/Makefile does this: x=`sed -n -e 's/^[ ]*PICFLAG[ ]*=[ ]*//p' < ../libiberty/Makefile | tail -1`