From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20526-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12599 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2002 14:14:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12591 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 14:14:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 14:14:38 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ItDn-00030C-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:14:59 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18IrLh-0001jw-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:15:01 -0500
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:14:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets
Message-ID: <20021202141500.GA6294@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20021126162728.02a31e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20021202011500.GA19215@nevyn.them.org> <jevg2cg0og.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <jevg2cg0og.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:44:31AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> 
> |> Or else Andreas's patch to decrease the number of registers.  Hmm,
> |> probably doing it Andreas's way is better.  I'll take care of this in
> |> the morning.
> 
> My way of fixing it is not complete, I get "Wrong sized register packet"
> messages from gdbserver.

Really?  Oh, I suppose that gdbserver is receiving 31 registers back
from GDB.  

Why is that happening?  There are 31 registers in m68k_register_name
but no remaining target implements the last two (did any obsolete
target?) and the register packet appears to be sized for 29 registers.

I'll investigate.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer