From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18243 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2002 16:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18233 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 16:13:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 16:13:33 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAUGDIhu000246; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:13:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAUGDIfj000270; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:13:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAUGDInq000267; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:13:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 08:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211301613.gAUGDInq000267@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@mvista.com In-reply-to: <3DE53144.3020502@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:55:32 -0500) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches (in 5.3 branch?)]] References: <3DE3F135.6030605@redhat.com> <3DE53144.3020502@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:55:32 -0500 From: Andrew Cagney This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090809040308030407020108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael (I suspect Mark is in bed by now), Is there any chance that the attached could be reviewed over the next few hours? Apparently not :-(. Anyway, I've looked at it now and it appears that GDB as it stands now isn't ready to cope with the abstraction of the lin-lwp layer as I intended it. So I guess that until we overhaul the way GDB deals with threads, Daniels patch (sans the #ifdef) is the way to go. Mark