From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22954 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2002 16:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22940 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 16:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 16:20:14 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id gATGKCa22444; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:20:12 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id gATGKCA20515; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:20:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211291620.gATGKCA20515@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj@delorie.com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: nickc@redhat.com CC: ac131313@redhat.com, neroden@twcny.rr.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Nick Clifton on 29 Nov 2002 17:20:03 +0000) Subject: Re: (toplevel patch) Remove 'vault' targets References: <20021128024607.GA14747@doctormoo> <3DE59B7C.10205@redhat.com> <200211280501.gAS519S00664@envy.delorie.com> <3DE65CE4.5020908@redhat.com> <3DE78612.6070603@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2 > In which case, Nath - please go ahead and apply the patches. Would it be wise to limit such patches to 1-3 per day, say, late in the USA day so a majority of the nightly auto-builds will catch it and we've got time to correct them before the next patch?