From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22934 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 09:53:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22917 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 09:53:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 09:53:16 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id JAA22321; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:52:54 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma022090; Tue, 26 Nov 02 09:52:31 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01406; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:52:30 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gAQ9qUT22115; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:52:30 GMT Message-Id: <200211260952.gAQ9qUT22115@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard Earnshaw , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: revamped gdb_mbuild.sh In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:51:53 EST." <3DE27149.90803@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:53:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 > Richard, > > Finally got to trying the gdb_mbuild.sh script and, in the process, > integrated some, er, `new features' from my old local script: > Looks pretty good to me. My only comment is that we loose the ability to run gnumake with -j replacing it with simultaneous configures/builds of different targets. That means a higher transient disk usage (storage) which would be a marginal problem for me due to lack of disk quota on the multi-way machines... ;-( But that's me thinking about my environment, so it isn't a major objection R.