From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22414 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 00:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22407 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 00:59:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 00:59:55 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18GVxQ-0003IE-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:00:16 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18GU51-0002Up-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:59:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: HPPA files naming convention... Message-ID: <20021126005959.GA9449@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20021126005631.GC23000@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021126005631.GC23000@gnat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00626.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:56:31PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I find the naming convention for the hppa targets too short for my > liking: - hppah -> hppa on hpux > - hppao -> hppa on osf > - hppab -> hppa on bsd > > I suggest we transition to a more verbose naming, which should be more > consistent with the other ports I know. For instance, how about > hppa-hpux instead of hppah. I hear a netbsd port will probably be done > in the future, we can then use hppa-netbsd. > > We would use this convention for the files in the config/pa directory > (tm-hppa-hpux.h, hppa-hpux.mt, etc), and also for for the files in gdb > (hppa-hpux-tdep.c). > > The part that is indenpedent of the OS would still stay in hppa (eg > tm-hppa, hppa-tdep.c, etc). > > Does this seam like a good idea? Absolutely! My tab completion loves you! -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer