From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10591 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 00:44:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10583 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 00:44:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yeah-baby.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 00:44:39 -0000 Received: by yeah-baby.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 2158) id 4385F7DB3; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:44:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:44:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Suggest obsoleting some of the HPPA ports Message-ID: <20021126004439.GB21009@yeah-baby.shagadelic.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20021126003151.GG1259@gnat.com> <20021126003938.GA29457@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021126003938.GA29457@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00622.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:39:38PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Certainly no objections from me! We haven't had build reports for any > of these in the last year at least, and in my humble opinion we don't > need to wait a release cycle to lose them. Yah, seconded. Eventually I'm going to have to do gdb support for hppa-netbsd, and a more maintainable hppa port will be a good start :-) -- -- Jason R. Thorpe