From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 711 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 09:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 697 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 09:50:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 09:50:45 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id JAA20157; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:50:42 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma019365; Thu, 14 Nov 02 09:50:00 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20713; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:49:59 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gAE9nxm10294; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:49:59 GMT Message-Id: <200211140949.gAE9nxm10294@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Michael Snyder cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: [RFA] arm_store_return_value, big-endian (take 2) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:55:04 PST." <3DD2AE18.C1D0E978@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:50:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 > Oh, I see. Yes, it's no longer necessary. But if it's not so hard, > and you already see what's necessary, why not just do it instead of > ragging on me to do it? ;-) > Because I don't have a big-endian world in which I can test it. > This what you have in mind? Please just take it from here, I really > didn't intend to spend this much time and energy on it. Nope, now you've broken larger-than-word objects. > > Index: arm-tdep.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v > retrieving revision 1.74 > diff -p -r1.74 arm-tdep.c > *** arm-tdep.c 1 Nov 2002 21:21:49 -0000 1.74 > --- arm-tdep.c 13 Nov 2002 19:48:21 -0000 > *************** arm_store_return_value (struct type *typ > *** 2417,2424 **** > break; > } > } > ! else > ! write_register_bytes (ARM_A1_REGNUM, valbuf, TYPE_LENGTH (type)); > } > > /* Store the address of the place in which to copy the structure the > --- 2417,2424 ---- > break; > } > } > ! else > ! write_register (ARM_A1_REGNUM, unpack_long (type, valbuf); > } > > /* Store the address of the place in which to copy the structure the >