From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26304 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2002 18:27:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26290 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2002 18:27:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2002 18:27:19 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id gADIE6e30528; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:14:06 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id gADIE5U13558; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:14:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211131814.gADIE5U13558@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj@delorie.com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: klee@apple.com, neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3DD28E8B.70803@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:40:27 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Update Darwin support in top-level configure.in References: <3DEB26DF-F72B-11D6-B5E7-00039396EEB8@apple.com> <3DD28E8B.70803@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 > I think this should be sent to GCC. Nathanael is currently merging the > two top-level directories so the place to get this committed is in GCC. Nathanael is doing the autoconfiscation. The toplevel directories are pretty much already merged, at least for the important bits we maintain locally. As far as I'm concerned, any top level patch can be approved on either side, as long as it gets applied to both sides (either by the submitter, or if they can't, by me).