From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30175 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2002 04:53:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30155 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 04:53:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 04:53:06 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAC4U2w09178; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:30:02 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAC4r5D02479; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:53:05 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAC4r5l26275; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:53:05 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAC4r4x13746; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:53:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200211120453.gAC4r4x13746@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: neroden@twcny.rr.com CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20021112043650.GA8233@doctormoo> (message from Nathanael Nerode on Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:36:50 -0500) Subject: Re: top level patch: even MORE autoconfiness References: <20021112043650.GA8233@doctormoo> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 Do we still need two seds? Why can't we add those exprs to the second sed?