From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15188 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2002 10:13:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15180 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2002 10:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO molenda.com) (192.220.74.81) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2002 10:13:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 30842 invoked by uid 19025); 9 Nov 2002 10:13:12 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 02:13:00 -0000 From: Jason Molenda To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jjohnstn@redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Fix MI stack frame output for synthetic frames Message-ID: <20021109021312.A30696@molenda.com> References: <20021108142248.A65720@molenda.com> <3DCC3CEE.5040902@redhat.com> <20021109004723.A20334@molenda.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021109004723.A20334@molenda.com>; from jason-swarelist@molenda.com on Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:47:23AM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:47:23AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: > [gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog] > 2002-11-09 Jason Molenda (jason-cl@molenda.com) > > * gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.exp: New tests for synthetic frames in > stack backtraces. > * gdb.mi/inferior-mischief.c: Part of same. Incidentally, I suppose I should duplicate the .exp file for an mi1 version. They'll be nearly identical at this point, but as mi2 changes there may be differences, and anyone specifically targetting mi1 (oh say Apple :-) would want to keep testing this stuff even in mi1 mode.