From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9386 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 20:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9371 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 20:51:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 20:51:21 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18AHyO-0003st-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:51:32 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18AG6z-00076j-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 15:52:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch rfc rfa:i386] Add i386 specific register groups Message-ID: <20021108205216.GA27305@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3DCBFA0C.70409@redhat.com> <86wunn6cea.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3DCC1F54.1000108@redhat.com> <20021108203554.GA26388@nevyn.them.org> <3DCC2207.9080708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DCC2207.9080708@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:43:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >This ok? > > > >>> > >>> > >>>Hmm, why are all registers in group "general"? > > > >> > >>Preserving existing behavior? :-^ > >> > > > >>> I'd expect the group > >>>general to only include the general-purpose registers. > > > >> > >>So you'd like the mmx and sse registers excluded > >>(general corresponds to `info all-registers')? > >> > >>Just give the word, > > > > > >Wait - does general correspond to `all-registers' or `registers'? > > Oops, yes, other way: > > general == info registers > all == info all-registers In that case, I'll throw my preference for excluding mmx/sse from info registers. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer