From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19961-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13534 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 09:57:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13486 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 09:57:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 09:57:47 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id JAA00518; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:57:28 GMT
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xmaa00472; Fri, 8 Nov 02 09:57:25 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12358;
	Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:57:22 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gA89vMV18298;
	Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:57:22 GMT
Message-Id: <200211080957.gA89vMV18298@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
        cagney@redhat.com, kevinb@redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
Subject: Re: [RFA] arm_store_return_value, big-endian (take 2) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:19:47 PST."
             <3DCB2D53.E19B382A@redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 01:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2

> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > 
> > Leaving asside the issue of the correctness of write_register_bytes (note
> > to self, must finish of my register patches), I don't think this is
> > correct -- in fact, I think it's also wrong for little-endian as well.
> > 
> > What should happen is that the smaller-than-word value should be
> > zero/sign-extended to 32 bits and then the whole thing stored in A1_REGNUM.
> 
> Ah, thanks.  OK, how about this?
> 
> 2002-11-06  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* arm-tdep.c (arm_store_return_value): Handle offset of
> 	small types on big-endian machines.


And for little-endian?

R.