From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14629 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2002 02:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14557 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 02:30:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 02:30:28 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 5FA4AD2CC8; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:33:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 18:30:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Move _initialize_hppa_tdep to the end of file Message-ID: <20021107023312.GK5164@gnat.com> References: <20021106022555.GN5164@gnat.com> <15816.36335.124501.342414@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15816.36335.124501.342414@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 > > 2002-11-05 Joel Brobecker > > > > * hppa-tdep.c (_initialize_hppa_tdep): Move function body > > to end of file, to be more consistent with the pratice followed > > in other targets. > > Sure. Thanks for the little confirmation that this change was ok. > Actually multiarching a target is considered an obvious activity, so > you have the option of just post patches, instead of RFA's. For > instance see the multiarching of the h8300 (please do it with > incremental patches). The trouble is that I still consider myself new to the GDB project, and look forward to the many years of learning to come with great spirit. In the meantime, I often feel more confortable after I asked for a quick confirmation that my understanding was correct before doing some checkins that seem too obvious to be correct. The testsuite is a good tool, but is sometimes not enough. I could for instance introduce a bug in a different target. But I do reassure you, I will try to do as much as possible of the multiarch conversion without asking for RFAs :-). -- Joel