From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22916 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2002 16:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22840 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 16:25:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 16:25:28 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9RGPCdh000815; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:25:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9RGPCQ6005565; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:25:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9RGP9ks005560; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:25:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200210271625.g9RGP9ks005560@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3DBACF7C.4010403@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:23:08 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Address FIXME in i386-tdep.c:i386_extract_struct_value_address References: <200210261441.g9QEff6t004409@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3DBACF7C.4010403@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:23:08 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney > We know for sure here that we're not dealing with a cooked register. That's what you think :-) It's more correct here to use the cooked interface. Care to enlighten me? Is it that one should always use the cooked interface, except in code that's present to support the cooked interface in the first place? Mark