From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] useless code in symtab.c
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023233652.GA5247@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1k7k83fb2.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:29:05PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:54:13 -0400, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
>
> > David Carlton writes:
> >> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:32:32 -0400, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
>
> >>> Can you also knock out the one at:
>
> >>> linespec.c:38:extern char *find_template_name_end (char *);
>
> >> That one gets used by decode_line_1. (One of these days, I'll try
> >> to understand what that function is doing, but I'm not feeling
> >> quite that masochistic yet.) Though I don't see any compelling
> >> reason not to just #include "parser-defs.h" there instead of
> >> declaring that one function specially; should I go ahead and do
> >> that?
>
> > decode_line_1, I think it will also make coffee if you ask
> > nicely.... :-(
>
> I really will have to give it a look; refactoring lookup_symbol_aux
> was fairly pleasant and has turned out to be quite useful for me, so
> at some point I'll see if decode_line_1 is amenable to a similar
> treament. Probably not, though: lookup_symbol_aux breaks fairly
> neatly into a few decent-sized chunks, whereas decode_line_1 is a good
> deal longer (770 lines as opposed to 370) and seems to me, upon a
> brief skim, to not want to break apart nearly as nicely.
I admit (blasphemy!) I'm strongly considering declaring it dead, and
rewriting it to meet a proper specification. This means coming up with
one first though, so it's a little bit down my list.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 15:27 David Carlton
2002-10-23 15:35 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-23 15:43 ` David Carlton
2002-10-23 15:57 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-23 16:29 ` David Carlton
2002-10-23 16:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-10-23 17:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-23 17:25 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021023233652.GA5247@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox