From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24020 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 14:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23965 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 14:25:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 14:25:19 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1840tq-0004df-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:24:54 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 183zyT-0004RU-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:25:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Handle MIPS in step-test.exp Message-ID: <20021022142537.GA16933@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com References: <20021022020218.GA22839@nevyn.them.org> <3DB55E72.3060700@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB55E72.3060700@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:19:30AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >The MIPS PIC calling conventions have a $gp register which needs to be > >reloaded after function calls, so they need the same treatment IA-64 and PA > >do in step-test. I also needed to finish stepping past one call before > >looking for the next or the test showed a bogus failure. > > Is this a straight GDB bug? It's a straight testsuite bug. The test is full of assumptions about when nexti will move to the next source line. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer