From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12477 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 03:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12470 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 03:48:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 03:48:36 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 75903D2CC7; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [PATCH] regenerate gdb/configure (was "Re: [RFA] define NEW_PROC_API on Interix") Message-ID: <20021022034930.GN7331@gnat.com> References: <20021021063300.GZ7331@gnat.com> <3DB44188.70601@redhat.com> <20021021185331.GE7331@gnat.com> <3DB47AB0.9040702@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB47AB0.9040702@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Would you like me to regenerate it? (without any change to configure.in > >I mean). > > Yes please! I just committed the following in the trunk: 2002-10-20 Joel Brobecker * configure: Regenerate using the proper version of autoconf. I am not posting the patch to configure because it is quite substencial. -- Joel