From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14254 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2002 16:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14246 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2002 16:16:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2002 16:16:52 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1803Ol-0000IH-00; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:16:27 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1802Sx-0000l7-00; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:16:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Carlton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [drow-cplus-branch] lookup_symbol_aux refactoring Message-ID: <20021011161643.GA2862@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:07:51AM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > Is it okay if I commit the lookup_symbol_aux refactoring from > to > drow-cplus-branch? I've got some patches to symbol table lookup to > handle namespace stuff that are almost ready (I just want to add some > testcases), and they'll be a lot cleaner if I get this part of them > out of the way first. Hmm... yes, this will be useful for me, too. The only bit I'm nervous about is the changed search order, but we can update this to match whatever goes in mainline when your patch is approved. Please do. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer