From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: Search for symbol names the same way they're hashed.
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021007233933.GA12031@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro165wdn8gh.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:19:10PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:05:15 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
>
> > Right now, there are multiple functions with the same symbol
> > demangled name, but different mangled names.
>
> Just out of curiosity, what are the current situations that you know
> of where that can happen? I just noticed today that unnamed
Well, that comment was about constructors:
_ZN1AC1Eb
A::A[in-charge](bool)
_ZN1AC2Eb
A::A[not-in-charge](bool)
We strip off the [in-charge] bit because we don't have any use for it.
> namespaces in different files can demangle to the same name, which
> sure doesn't thrill me; I'm curious about where else demangling is
> losing important info.
We can't even use the demangled names of such things, anyway. We'll
need to figure out what to do with them eventually...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-07 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 20:45 Jim Blandy
2002-10-02 10:45 ` David Carlton
2002-10-02 12:35 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-02 12:41 ` David Carlton
2002-10-02 13:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 13:20 ` David Carlton
2002-10-02 13:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 13:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-10-02 14:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 16:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-10-02 16:19 ` Setting the demangling style Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 11:04 ` RFA: Search for symbol names the same way they're hashed Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 12:10 ` David Carlton
2002-10-07 16:19 ` David Carlton
2002-10-07 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
[not found] <1033595444.9324.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2002-10-02 17:49 ` Jim Ingham
2002-10-02 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 18:25 ` Jim Ingham
2002-10-03 8:15 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021007233933.GA12031@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox