From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19289-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7689 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2002 18:06:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7682 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2002 18:06:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2002 18:06:17 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g96I63ki000557;
	Sun, 6 Oct 2002 20:06:03 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g96I62Ej000887;
	Sun, 6 Oct 2002 20:06:02 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g96I61hf000884;
	Sun, 6 Oct 2002 20:06:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 11:06:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200210061806.g96I61hf000884@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: drow@mvista.com
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-reply-to: <20021005201731.GA19485@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:17:31 -0400)
Subject: Re: RFA: Delete CPLUS_MARKER
References:  <20021005201731.GA19485@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2

   Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:17:31 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

   Going through old patches yesterday, I found one from David Miller to
   multi-arch CPLUS_MARKER.  Andrew thought one aspect of the way it interacted
   with multi-arch wasn't quite right, so it never went in.  Rather than fix
   it, I've just whacked CPLUS_MARKER entirely.

If that's indeed feasable, I'd certainly prefer whacking CPLUS_MARKER
over multi-arching it.

   And especially:
     - This patch removes i386/tm-i386v4.h, which only existed to define
   CPLUS_MARKER.  Another one bites the dust.

That certainly has my blessing.

Mark