Re: [patch rfa:doco rfc:NEWS] mi1 -> mi2; rm mi0

Andrew Cagney
2002-10-01T21:26:48Z

Just FYI, I've checked in the attatched. Unless it's in it isn't
possible to test that an MI change works with the new mi2 syntax but
doesn't break the mi1 syntax.

It still leaves unresolved, the issue of when mi2 should be frozen.

Andrew

> Index: ChangeLog
> 2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * NEWS: Mention that MI syntax changed to "mi2" and that "mi0"
> syntax has been removed.
>
> Index: doc/ChangeLog
> 2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Update --interpreter option. "mi2"
> and "mi1" instead of "mi1" and "mi0".
>
> Index: mi/ChangeLog
> 2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * mi-main.c (mi2_command_loop): New function.
> (mi0_command_loop): Delete function.
> (_initialize_mi_main): Recognize, and default to, "mi2". Do not
> recognize "mi0".
> * mi-out.c (mi_table_begin): Remove mi0 code.
> (mi_table_body, mi_table_end): Ditto.
> (mi_table_header, mi_open, mi_close): Ditto.
>