From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24249 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 19:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24242 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 19:55:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 19:55:21 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17vl5r-0007Wk-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:55:12 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17vkA9-0001bE-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:55:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch rfa:doco rfc:NEWS] mi1 -> mi2; rm mi0 Message-ID: <20020929195533.GA5967@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3D974315.2050201@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D974315.2050201@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:14:45PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > The attached patch updates things so that "mi2" is the default MI > syntax. I need to add a mechanism so that the MI code can query the > version but I'll post that separatly. > > It modifies NEWS (comments?). > It updates the doco (ok?). > > Andrew It seems to me that this is going about everything backwards. There isn't an mi2 yet, is there? Only mi1 and some incompatible, proposed changes. Why are we making the default mi2 before we figure out what mi2 is? Not necessarily bad, but definitely unintuitive. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer