From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18932-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2671 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2002 09:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2614 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 09:25:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 09:25:58 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id KAA13727; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:25:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma013213; Wed, 25 Sep 02 10:25:31 +0100
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.202.26])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18184;
	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:25:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8P9PTs05484;
	Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:25:29 +0100
Message-Id: <200209250925.g8P9PTs05484@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>, neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
Subject: Re: toplevel Makefile.in: autogenerate more 
In-reply-to: Your message of "24 Sep 2002 23:44:41 -0300."
             <orvg4ueqjq.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:26:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2

> On Sep 24, 2002, DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote:
> 
> > As much as I like automation, this rule is bad.  Not everyone has
> > autogen, and those who don't shouldn't get penalized if they happen to
> > get the timestamps rearranged.
> 
> If they use the recommended script, contrib/gcc_update, they'll get it
> right.

Not if you are updating gdb, or binutils it won't.

R.