From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26797 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2002 15:56:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26759 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 15:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.hccnet.nl) (62.251.0.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 15:56:15 -0000 Received: from charis.vernstok by smtp.hccnet.nl via fia16-123.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.123.16] with ESMTP id RAA26257 (8.8.8/1.13); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:56:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from jelmer by charis.vernstok with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17ts2j-0000N3-00; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:56:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:56:00 -0000 From: Jelmer Vernooij To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Final(?) GDB/MI -symbol-* Message-ID: <20020924155608.GA1284@vernstok.dyndns.org> References: <20020924135319.GA1107@vernstok.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux charis 2.4.18-686 X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00582.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote about 'Re: [RFC] Final(?) GDB/MI -symbol-*': > > I've (IRL) mailed the copyright assignment for the FSF back today - > > anything else I need to do to get this patch in (who will review & > > commit it or am I given CVS access?) > The Texinfo part is okay, except that it has many instances of only one > blank after a period that ends a sentence. Please make sure every such > period is followed by two blanks, not one. That's because two blanks > cause TeX to typeset the printed version better. hmm.. I tried to 'imitate' the style of gdbmi.texi as much as possible; Could you give an example? Or maybe the rest of gdbmi.texi isn't up to date as well... Jelmer