From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15972 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 14:52:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15958 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 14:52:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 14:52:00 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id PAA05377; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:51:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma005342; Thu, 19 Sep 02 15:51:51 +0100 Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.202.26]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07855; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:51:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8JEpos05976; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:51:50 +0100 Message-Id: <200209191451.g8JEpos05976@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Elena Zannoni cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Cagney , David Carlton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, main part In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:16:16 EDT." <15753.52768.684592.910377@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 > Should we document these scripts somewhere? Maybe a README file of some > sort? Or would it be more appropriate to have a chapter/section in > the internal manual? Maybe the web pages, or wherever we say what the submission rules for patches are. R.