From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21987 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2002 20:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21923 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 20:36:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.hccnet.nl) (62.251.0.13) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 20:36:07 -0000 Received: from charis.vernstok by smtp.hccnet.nl via fia16-123.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.123.16] with ESMTP id WAA25692 (8.8.8/1.13); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:36:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from jelmer by charis.vernstok with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17r2bF-0002Tj-00; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:36:05 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:36:00 -0000 From: Jelmer Vernooij To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Updated mi-cmd-symbol.c patch Message-ID: <20020916203605.GD9483@vernstok.dyndns.org> References: <20020913195941.GA5433@vernstok.dyndns.org> <20020914124614.GA5327@vernstok.dyndns.org> <20020914151406.GA8213@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020914151406.GA8213@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux charis 2.4.18-686 X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 The 'normal' gdb has the option to specify a in and an out filedescriptor... Shouldn't there be such a thing for MI? Or maybe a fifo? Jelmer On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 11:14:06AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote about 'Re: [RFC] Updated mi-cmd-symbol.c patch': > Not when running natively. It's a known bug, although no one has > really decided what to do about it. For instance, some programs simply > require a terminal - we need some way to provide them a terminal, for > graphical debuggers to use... > On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 02:46:14PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Btw, is there currently any way to determine whether the output from > > gdb/mi comes from gdb/mi or from the program that's being debugged? > > The docs say that gdb prepends such lines with a '@' but that's not > > what gdb really does... -- Jelmer Vernooij http://samba.org/~jelmer/ Samba Team http://www.samba.org/ Running