From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18480-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7652 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2002 17:36:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7645 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 17:36:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 17:36:24 -0000
Received: from porcupine.slc.redhat.com (vpn50-26.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.26])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03218;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porcupine (law@localhost)
	by porcupine.slc.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8AHfYg10779;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:41:34 -0600
Message-Id: <200209101741.g8AHfYg10779@porcupine.slc.redhat.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: fix interrupt.exp for hpux11 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Sep 2002 20:49:07 EDT."
             <15741.16771.968097.797722@localhost.redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:36:00 -0000
From: Jeff Law <law@porcupine.slc.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2

In message <15741.16771.968097.797722@localhost.redhat.com>, Elena Zannoni writ
es:
 >Jeff Law writes:
 > > 
 > > This is a repost of a patch I submitted last year, but which was
 > > never approved.  It's incorrect to use TT_PROC_CONTINUE in this
 > > context due to its inability to pass along (or clear pending) signals.
 > > 
 > > This fixes interrupt.exp for hpux11.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 	* infttrace.c (child_resume): Simplify and rework to avoid
 > > 	TT_PROC_CONTINUE.
 >
 >I don't see any harm in this. The file is only used for hpux11. There
 >are no current maintainers, and you were the previous maintainer, so,
 >sure, go ahead.
FWIW, I never maintained infttrace -- that code came from HP and I've only
dug into it a couple times to fix bugs.

Anyway, at least this problem is fixed :-)

jeff