From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21035 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2002 14:11:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21024 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2002 14:11:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.intrinsity.com) (208.246.32.130) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 14:11:01 -0000 Received: from victoria.eng.evsx.com (victoria.eng.evsx.com [192.168.1.29]) by mailhost.intrinsity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88813F40C for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:11:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from beeville.vert.intrinsity.com (beeville.vert.intrinsity.com [192.168.3.48]) by victoria.eng.evsx.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g87EB0018803; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:11:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Fred Fish Received: (from fnf@localhost) by beeville.vert.intrinsity.com (8.11.2/8.11.4) id g87EAR619835; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:10:27 -0500 Message-Id: <200209071410.g87EAR619835@beeville.vert.intrinsity.com> Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix inferior restart problem in gdb.base/commands.exp To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 07:11:00 -0000 Cc: fnf@intrinsity.com Reply-To: fnf@intrinsity.com In-Reply-To: <200209071404.g87E4kb19664@beeville.vert.intrinsity.com> from "Fred Fish" at Sep 07, 2002 09:04:45 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 > Also, to avoid having to specifically test for noinferiorio we don't > check for output from the test case, it is not relevant to the given > test anyway. Hmm, I just realized that this may not be true since we probably want to ensure that the breakpoint at factorial really does get cleared and only hit once. More likely what we should do is call factorial with 2 instead of 1, and in the command list print the value, and in the expected results look for that printout from the command excuted when the breakpoint is hit and cleared. I'll tweak it and resubmit. Assuming that change is made, do I have approval for the patch? -Fred