From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27958 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2002 21:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27949 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 21:32:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.174) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 21:32:35 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id B1C319869; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 14:32:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multi-arch SIGTRAMP_{START|END} for FreeBSD/i386 Message-ID: <20020906143234.U503@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200209062047.g86KlBcd000771@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200209062047.g86KlBcd000771@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>; from kettenis@chello.nl on Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > This removes the last #defines from i386/tm-fbsd.h. Yippie! Cool! I can nuke i386/tm-nbsd.h once the solib stuff is multi-arch'd, too... man, that'll be nice... > Jason, just to be safe, I reset sigtramp_start and sigtramp_end on > NetBSD. I added a FIXME too, but the obvious implementation of > sigtramp_start using i386nbsd_sigtramp_offset is probably not going to > work, since then very weird things happen to libc-provided signal > trampolines. I need to think about that a bit more (Linux suffers > from a similar problem). Yah... FWIW, gdb already notices signal trampolines on the stack, but just says , rather than (which is just fine with me, FWIW :-) I'm super-busy next week (Intel Developer Forum), but I'll have time to think/talk about it some more after that... -- -- Jason R. Thorpe