From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27983 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2002 12:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27974 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2002 12:30:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2002 12:30:26 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17mDlM-0008Oa-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:30:36 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17mCp7-0005tQ-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:30:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 05:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64 Message-ID: <20020903123025.GA22555@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3D6BF1D5.70409@ges.redhat.com> <3D6E231D.8060906@suse.cz> <20020829142120.GA5176@nevyn.them.org> <3D6E3666.7070309@suse.cz> <20020829150833.GA29973@nevyn.them.org> <3D6E40EE.5000904@ges.redhat.com> <4.2.0.58.20020830155945.00a473b0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3D6F81F5.2040002@suse.cz> <4.2.0.58.20020830164921.01c6fba8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3D747E37.7060005@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D747E37.7060005@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:17:43AM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Pierre Muller wrote: > >>>set (int)$eflags &=0xfffe > > > >That one was finally easy to solve : > >(I still have the old version of the patch on my computer...) > >The following patch was enough to get > >set $eflags &= 0xfffe > >to work again... > >it just allows TYPE_CODE_FLAGS to be considered as an integer type for > >binary operations > >maybe some other small similar changes are required for unary operations, > >but it should be easy to solve ! > > Thanks for help. Attached file incorporates your patch as well. Could > anyone approve it, please? Can't approve it, but I like it. Thanks for following this through. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer