From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20050 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2002 21:50:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20037 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2002 21:50:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2002 21:50:31 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17kY2e-0006ib-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:45:32 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17kX7W-0006SQ-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:46:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: "Peter.Schauer" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't use minsym name when searching block Message-ID: <20020829214630.GA24804@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , "Peter.Schauer" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200208241058.MAA32586@reaktor.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01005.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:28:07PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > "Peter.Schauer" writes: > > I proposed a very similar patch almost two years ago, but it got turned > > down and I was tired of arguing. Please note that there are two more > > calls to lookup_block_symbol in the #ifdef HPUXHPPA block, which I think > > have to be adjusted as well. > > Okay, thanks for pointing that out. > > > See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-10/msg00250.html > > Do you think it's really best to use SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME, instead of > just `name'? I had the impression that the full symbol names were > always demangled, so the name to use shouldn't depend on the setting > of the `demangle' flag, as SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME does. You are absolutely correct. SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME should be (is?) only for display. I fixed a couple bugs in this area recently, although I don't remember whether I posted the patch... I'll check. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer