From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020828224247.GA27335@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro17kiahb81.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:25:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> Here's a ping for a patch that I'd like to get in before the 5.3
> branch is cut; I'm sending the ping now even though I originally sent
> the patch out just under a week ago because I'll be out of the office
> through next Monday. (I'm not this pushy normally, honest.)
>
> The reason why I want to get this into the 5.3 branch is because it
> fixes a seg fault and seg faults make me unduly nervous. :-)
My judgement would be that this fixes an obvious mistake in my previous
patch.
> @@ -2327,7 +2328,15 @@ dwarf2_add_member_fn (struct field_info
> struct type *return_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (die->type);
> int nparams = TYPE_NFIELDS (die->type);
>
> - smash_to_method_type (fnp->type, die->type,
> + /* NOTE: carlton/2002-08-22: Previously, the second argument to
> + smash_to_method_type was die->type rather than type, and the
> + type argument to dwarf2_add_member_fn didn't exst. This is
> + incorrect: the second argument to smash_to_method_type should
> + be the type of the class that this is a method of, whereas
> + die->type is the type of the method itself. So we need to
> + pass that type in from read_structure_scope explicitly. See
> + PR gdb/653. */
> + smash_to_method_type (fnp->type, type,
> TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (die->type),
> TYPE_FIELDS (die->type),
> TYPE_NFIELDS (die->type),
I'd rather a comment like:
/* TYPE is the domain of this method, and DIE->TYPE is the type
of the method itself (TYPE_CODE_METHOD). */
There's no point in cluttering up the code with history of this sort
unless you have low confidence in the change's effect on some odd
corner-case. That's just my personal judgement, though.
If you agree, mind committing it with that or a similar change?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-28 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-28 15:42 David Carlton
2002-08-28 15:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-08-28 16:43 ` David Carlton
2002-08-28 17:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-03 10:37 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020828224247.GA27335@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox