From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22118 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2002 17:18:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22111 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2002 17:18:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2002 17:18:54 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7IHIrmS000797 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:18:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7IHIr4w029440 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:18:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7IHIrg6029437; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:18:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200208181718.g7IHIrg6029437@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [PATCH] Remove some write_register_bytes occurences from i386-tdep.c X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 This replaces two write_register_bytes invocations with write_register_gen. The remaining occurences are in principle legitimate calls to write_register_bytes, since the intent *is* a partial update of a register. Of course I can "open code" these calls if that's desirable. Checked in. Mark Index: ChangeLog from Mark Kettenis * i386-tdep.c (i386_do_pop_frame, i386_store_return_value): Call write_register_gen instead of write_register_bytes. Index: i386-tdep.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-tdep.c,v retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -p -r1.81 i386-tdep.c --- i386-tdep.c 17 Aug 2002 11:39:38 -0000 1.81 +++ i386-tdep.c 18 Aug 2002 17:15:10 -0000 @@ -833,8 +833,7 @@ i386_do_pop_frame (struct frame_info *fr if (addr) { read_memory (addr, regbuf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum)); - write_register_bytes (REGISTER_BYTE (regnum), regbuf, - REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum)); + write_register_gen (regnum, regbuf); } } write_register (FP_REGNUM, read_memory_integer (fp, 4)); @@ -1003,8 +1002,7 @@ i386_store_return_value (struct type *ty not exactly how it would happen on the target itself, but it is the best we can do. */ convert_typed_floating (valbuf, type, buf, builtin_type_i387_ext); - write_register_bytes (REGISTER_BYTE (FP0_REGNUM), buf, - FPU_REG_RAW_SIZE); + write_register_gen (FP0_REGNUM, buf); /* Set the top of the floating-point register stack to 7. The actual value doesn't really matter, but 7 is what a normal