From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29925 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2002 22:53:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29914 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 22:52:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 22:52:58 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 36858D2CBD; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:53:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Question regarding i386v4-nat.c:supply_gregset and fill_gregset Message-ID: <20020813225259.GJ916@gnat.com> References: <20020807010426.GN916@gnat.com> <200208132206.g7DM6IOV034806@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208132206.g7DM6IOV034806@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 > Sorry for the slow response. I was having a vacation :-). Actually, me too :-). > That would be a valid approach (although I would name the functions > i386_supply_gregs and i386_fill_gregs). On the other hand, I wouldn't > object to duplicating the small bits of code for Interix and deal with > it later. I'll have to rethink these functions sooner or later if I > want to support cross-debugging of core files. This is the route I took: duplicating this small bit of code, leaving the cleanup for later. -- Joel