From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25601 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2002 22:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25589 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 22:00:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 22:00:14 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DM03Sx000459; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7DM03L0034789; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7DM03vH034786; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200208132200.g7DM03vH034786@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@mvista.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020812161447.GA770@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:14:47 -0400) Subject: Re: RFA: gdb/568, messy thread exits References: <20020731163910.GA5622@nevyn.them.org> <20020812161447.GA770@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:14:47 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Michael, Mark - what do you think of this patch? A better explanation of the patch is at: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-07/msg00630.html It's a kludge. Therefore I'm not inclined to say that this can go in. We should really fix things such that lwp_from_thread isn't called under the circumstances where you're having problems, or we should modify it such that it doesn't have to call td_ta_map_id2thr() under those troublesome circumstances. If we can't come up with such a patch in a timely fashion, we could decide to get this in, but not without a comment saying that it is a kludge. Mark