From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13122 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 15:45:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13009 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 15:45:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 15:45:13 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id QAA13832; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:44:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma012682; Wed, 7 Aug 02 16:43:38 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2 [172.16.1.91]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09034; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:43:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26484; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:43:36 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200208071543.QAA26484@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: Eli Zaretskii cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [RFA] cli/cli-dump.c: Write dump always in binary mode on Cygwin In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Aug 2002 07:42:47 +0300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 08:45:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > do we actually know of any environments > > where the #if is strictly necessary? > > Since GDB requires ISO C, and "wb" is part of the ISO C spec, I think we > can drop the #if. (Dependance on O_BINARY being defined is not very > clean anyway, IMHO, since O_BINARY does not belong to `fopen'.) > I don't think we can assume an ISO conforming C library. R.