From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22969 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 18:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22962 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2002 18:18:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2002 18:18:41 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 3F558D2CBD; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 11:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Add declaration in i386-tdep.h (for interix) Message-ID: <20020802181838.GI1053@gnat.com> References: <20020730191256.GE19161@gnat.com> <3D49B340.3060906@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D49B340.3060906@ges.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 > (The function would at least need to be namespace proofed - leading > i386_ bit I 386 question) Ok, I'll wait for an i386 maintainer to comment. I can make this kind of change, and I think it would make sense. > BTW, Have you looked at the osabi mechanism? The above may not even be > needed. Yes, I am using this mechanism in the interix port to set the gdbarch bits. That's where I need this definition, to get rid of one extern. -- Joel