Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com,
	kevinb@redhat.com, echristo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Mips, N32, cc, gcc, and gdb (longish)
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020802015734.GA28572@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D49DCF8.AB4C6718@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 06:14:32PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> OK, I think I've made this as concise as practical.   ;-)
> 
> In case the difference between Irix cc and gcc does not get 
> fixed (and I mean specifically the difference concerning 
> alignment of small struct arguments), I'd like to discuss 
> "fixing" gdb so that it will work correctly with both.
> 
> I've found a testcase for this problem in call-ar-st.exp:
> 
> (gdb) print print_long_arg_list (a, b, c, d, e, f, *struct1, 
> 	*struct2, *struct3, *struct4, *flags, *flags_combo, 
> 	*three_char, *five_char, *int_char_combo, 
> 	*d1, *d2, *d3, *f1, *f2, *f3)
> 
> This fails (or doesn't) depending on whether a small struct
> is left-justified or right-justified when it is pushed onto
> the stack (ie, when it is the 5th or higher argument).
> 
> The code in mips_push_arguments that controls this is:
> 
>       if (MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE == 8 &&
>           (typecode == TYPE_CODE_INT ||
>            typecode == TYPE_CODE_PTR ||
>            typecode == TYPE_CODE_FLT) && len <= 4)
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
>       else if ((typecode == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT ||
>                 typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
>               TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE)
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
>     }
> 
> As it is written, it "works" with gcc but fails with cc.
> 
> Kevin proposed this change to me (I don't remember if
> he has submitted it yet):
> 
> ***
>                 typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
> !              TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE)
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> ---
>                 typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
> !              TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE  
> !              && tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N32)
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> ***
> 
> With this change, it "works" with cc, but fails with gcc.
> 
> I want to discuss the following change, which should 
> make it "work" with both cc and gcc (given the current
> behavior of both):
> 
> ***
>                 typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
> !              TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE)
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> ---
>                 typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
> !              TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE  
> !              && (gcc_p ||tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N32))
>         longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> ***
> 
> 
> This of course makes gdb's behavior dependent on which 
> compiler it detects.
> 
> There is one problem: there is no variable "gcc_p" within 
> the scope of mips_push_arguments, because PUSH_ARGUMENTS 
> does not pass it.  So that would need to be solved, 
> possibly by modifying the definition of PUSH_ARGUMENTS.
> 
> Comments?

Comment - you're on a slippery slope.  I know of at least one other
variation in this area; for structures of less than a word SGI CC
shifts them in register only for big endian targets, and not for little
endian (on the old versions of CC which support little endian).  There
comes a point where we just need to get GCC fixed, and I think this is
it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-02  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-01 18:32 Michael Snyder
2002-08-01 18:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-08-01 19:42   ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-01 19:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-01 20:19       ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-02 10:22         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-02 12:52           ` Eric Christopher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020802015734.GA28572@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=cagney@redhat.com \
    --cc=echristo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox