From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20893 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 17:25:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20879 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 17:25:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 17:25:17 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 91DC6D2CBD; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jason R Thorpe , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] enable software single step on alpha-osf Message-ID: <20020731172513.GH683@gnat.com> References: <20020718203205.GB26990@gnat.com> <3D408B66.6010203@ges.redhat.com> <20020726061200.B3892@dr-evil.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020726061200.B3892@dr-evil.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:12:00AM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote: > > Unless Jason Thorpe objects, this part of the change is approved. The > > other alternative would be to select this based on the OS. > > No objections from me. I forgot to mention: I prefer to wait for the rest of the patch to be approved before enabling software single step on alpha-osf, because without the other fixes, although it greatly improves the situation with multi-processor machines, stepping on mono-processors does not work as well as previously. -- Joel